Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Gettysburg

The movie Gettysburg was a four and a half hour movie based on the novel, The Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara. The film’s title was changed because it was feared that the public would confuse it with, “just another biker movie”. I have included a clip of one of the pivotal battle scenes in the movie—Chamberlain’s defense of Little Round Top. From the first ideas and story drafts, to the final editing and postproduction, it took almost 15 years of work to make this film.

On October 8, 1993, the film Gettysburg, was released in theaters nationwide. It was originally conceived as a mini-series for Ted Turner’s TNT network. Turner realized that he had something special and so he prepared it for theatrical release.

The film covered the three-day battle involving 150,000 men on both sides. As the story begins, the narrator noted that Lee was aware that a note was delivered to Abraham Lincoln dictating terms of the surrender. Lee badly wanted this to be the last battle of the war.

The film covered all the major parts of the battle, from Chamberlain’s stand at Little Round Top to Pickett’s charge. Many of the actors in the film were exceptional. Sam Elliott did a wonderful job as John Buford who predicted the coming battle and held the high ground for the advance elements of the Union Army under John Reynolds. Buford told his men, “You know what is going to happen here in the morning? The whole damn reb army is going to be here. They'll move through this town, occupy these hills on the other side and when our people get here Lee will have the high ground.” One of his subordinates listens as he says, “Devin, I've led a soldier's life, and I've never seen anything as brutally clear as this.”

Jeff Daniels was exceptionally well cast. As Colonel Joshua Chamberlain, he had what I consider the best dialogue of any character in the film - whether it’s talking to deserters and telling them he, “fears that if we lose this battle then we lose this war,” or his conversation with Kevin Conway, as Killrainey, when he waxed philosophically about, “the divine spark” in men. Chamberlain, along with Elliott’s brief appearance, was one of the few Union characters that we got to know. On the other hand, the South had two of the more sympathetic characters in the movie in Lee and Longstreet.

Tom Berenger (Lieutenant General Longstreet) and Martin Sheen (Robert E. Lee) had an excellent chemistry between them. Longstreet didn’t want to fight the coming battle once he knew that the Union Army held the high ground. He argued that, “It is almost perfect, now we've got them where we want them. Swing south and east, down the road, get between them and Lincoln, find some good high ground, then they'll have to hit us, they'll have to, we'll have them, sir.” Longstreet, knowing the Confederates lacked the manpower of the North (Population of 23 million vs. 9 million), wanted to back off and stay with, “our strategy to conduct a defensive campaign wherever possible in order to keep the army intact.” Lee, knowing that he had a chance to end the war told Longstreet that maybe this wasn’t ideal ground but, “we have prevailed. The men have prevailed.” Longstreet knowing that it was just as important that the South preserve its Army as it was to inflict losses on the enemy suggested that if they must fight that they, “move to the south to Washington, they have to pursue us, and then we can fight on ground of our choosing.” Lee, knowing about the letter to Lincoln wanted to end the war in one final battle. He knew that doing so would result in great losses to both sides. He also knew that they would be fewer than with a long, protracted war. He lamented that, “To be a good soldier you must love the army. To be a good commander you must be able to order the death of the thing you love.”

As is common in all period films, the characters had a great time during filming. Martin Sheen, who perfectly captured Lee's Southern gentility, was a last minute replacement for Robert Duvall. Duvall would later play Lee in the movie prequel, Gods and Generals.

Berenger is deeply interested in World History though he majored in Journalism at the University of Missouri. Tom was so fond of his role as General James Longstreet, he later opened up a restaurant/nightclub in downtown Wilmington NC called "Longstreet's Irish Pub" which is still in business today.

My mother, on a recent business trip, visited the site of the three-day battle. Maggie Abbott, of Gettysburg, told her a story about the 75th Anniversary of the battle. In 1938, the surviving soldiers of the battle, then almost 100 years old, met each other on the Gettysburg site. My mother told me the soldiers began their walk across the open field where Pickett made his charge 75 years earlier. She said, “that as the soldiers neared each other, they began to yell at one another just as they must have in battle. As they neared each other though, overcome with emotion, they reached out to shake the hands of those who had once been their enemy.” On the field that day, they realized that they were no longer two armies but now they were all Americans. Perhaps, it is true, as Thomas Jefferson said, “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants” in order to keep all Americans free. Let us not forget that these men shown in this clip were the real heroes.

It could be argued that each side fought for the “right side”. The South fought to keep their way of life and a vision of an agricultural economy alive. They fought for State’s rights—a cause that our forefathers held dear as they wrote our constitution. The North fought not only to preserve the Union and keep the country unified as our forefathers intended. But they also fought as Chamberlain points out in the movie, “to set other men free.” Watching this clip, I am reminded that Brokaw was wrong about the “greatest generation”. Every generation has its heroes.


Monday, January 14, 2008

My first post since coming out of the hospital and the first of many which I hope will help me and maybe someone else out there who has had a life-changing event. These events can range from divorce, death of a parent, a child moving away from home, or in my case--a heart attack!

In future blogs, I will address some things that go through a person's mind when forced to make lifestyle changes to control heart disease and diabetes. I look forward to sharing some of my experiences and let everyone know that they are not alone. Right now, though, I want to stress that it does not have to be a health problem. There are many other factors that cause us to rethink our lives and make changes. No problem is worse than another and all can be solved through hard work and diligence. There is an anonymous saying, "God does not give us any more than we can handle." It is true, I think, that some people have a greater tolerance to pain and suffering. If you feel like you are one of those people, take a couple minutes to think about all the good times--the ones you wouldn't trade for all the money in the world. Think back to those days, take a deep breath, and realize that into every life a little rain must fall.

Every one of these events causes us to reassess our lives. Have we accomplished what we wanted? Did we make the right decisions? How did these decisions affect others? Would we do it all over again? All of these questions are relevant and only the person asking them can answer them. What your friends, family, and neighbors think is irrelevant. It's what you think that matters.

It is true that we are our own harshest critics, but it is also true that we know ourselves the best. Besides, the well-meaning people around us could judge us by their standards or society's standards. That is not what is important, what is important is that which makes us feel complete.

Aristotle teaches that each man’s life has a purpose and that the function of one's life is to attain that purpose. He explains that the purpose of life is earthly happiness or flourishing that can be achieved via reason and the acquisition of virtue. Articulating an explicit and clear understanding of the end toward which a person's life aims, Aristotle states that each human being should use his abilities to their fullest potential and should obtain happiness and enjoyment through the exercise of their realized capacities. He contends that human achievements are animated by purpose and autonomy and that people should take pride in being excellent at what they do. According to Aristotle, human beings have a natural desire and capacity to know and understand the truth, to pursue moral excellence, and to initiate their ideals in the world through action.

What do you want to do? What were you put on this earth to do? Answering these questions is not easy. I am reading a book, 48 days to a job you love, by Dan Miller. He contends that since you spend so much of your time at work, your life's purpose should logically be revealed in your work. Dan points out that we achieve satisfaction only by embracing our passions and using the talent that is present in each one of us. Since we spend one-third of our life at work, being happy and fulfilled is certainly a worthwhile goal.

I would like to take it one step further, I believe that achieving one's full potential can be expressed in so many other ways than work. I believe that self actualization is not only improving one's self, but improving the quality of the lives around you.

Henry David Thoreau writes that, "I learned this, at least, by my experiment; that if one advances confidently in the direction of one's dreams, and endeavors to live the life he has imagined, he will meet a success unexpected in common hours. He will put some things behind, will pass an individual boundary; new, universal, and more liberal laws will begin to establish around and within him; or the old laws be expanded, and interpreted in his favor a more liberal sense, and he will live with the license of a higher order of beings. In proportion as he simplifies his life, the laws of the universe will appear less complex, and solitude will not be solitude, nor poverty poverty, nor weakness weakness. If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; That is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them."

In my personal experience, I have not had the career that most of the people around me have thought I should. I must admit that it has never seemed that important to me. I realize that it is a neccessary evil, I need career and the money that comes with a successful career to pay mounting medical bills. I want to try to do it on my terms, however, arousing passions within me for literature, history, arts, and sports. Maybe, by cultivating these interests in myself, I will find a way to make a useful contribution to those around me and, hopefully, society as a whole.

As a first step, I am selling most of my possessions. Some will remain of course--I can't imagine a life without books for example. But much of what I have accumulated is really tying me down. Shakespeare writes that, "The love of money is the root of all evil." Just like money, our possessions can sometimes rule us so that we become slaves to what we have, not what we need. Aside from family, friends and a faith in a greater being above, I cannot believe there is much that I really need. I cannot imagine a life without books or music, and so, those things will never leave my life completely. However, do I really need every paperback I have ever owned or cassette tapes I will never be able to play again. Those things are going on ebay right now or being donated to various charities. Until I free myself of all these material things, I will never life the true purposeful life intended for me.

Look around, I am sure that you will find things in your life that serve only as clutter or negative energy. Isn't it time that you freed yourself from the chains that shackle you and leave you a prisoner. Good Luck! I hope that other people find this blog to be as useful as I have found it to be therapeutic. Take stock of your own situation, if you are not entirely happy, make the changes now to ensure your happiness and eventual goal of self-actualization.

As you read more posts by me concerning my physical recovery, my chosen career path, and my road to self-enlightenment, you will notice that I reference the movie character Rocky many times. He is probably my favorite character of all time (Paul Newman's Butch Cassidy is close). This is because in film, Rocky represents all I ever wanted to be. I saw the first Rocky in 1976. I can honestly say that character changed my life. I have not made all the right decisions in life, but I have never intentionally hurt anyone. I have always tried to be humble and never give up just like Rocky. Somehow, though, I slipped off track.

All my life, I have never backed down from physical confrontation, I have never let one person bully another in my presence, I have stood up for what I thought was right (no vandalism) even when it was unpopular with my friends. Five of my grade school classmates beat me up one day after school. I still don't know why they did it. But were they surprised when I showed up for school the next day (never had any more problems after that). Anyway, my point is that I never lacked for heroes (I have several in my own family). So though I never had any problems physically, I feel I might have missed out on an even greater lesson than the one about physical courage.

Rocky could be an accountant. It is not his physical toughness that matters so much as his single minded goals that he sets for himself. In the first movie, Rocky states, "All I want is to go the distance with Apollo, no one's ever done that." Think about it, Rocky knows that he will lose but he steps into the ring with a superior opponent. That is physical courage, but that is also a man that strives to meet a goal under what others might say is an impossible circumstance.

In everybody's life, there are obstacles. It is how you react to those obstacles that matter. To end, here is my favorite part of, Rocky Balboa, I hope you that you enjoy it and take something away from it as I have.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Daily Musings

This is my first entry into the world of blogging. I have a unique sense of humor and hope that it comes out through this outlet. This journal will be thoughts or recollections about people, places, and events that I have experienced (or hope to experience). Since this is my first foray, be patient with me. I can not guarantee that your patience will be rewarded--I can only hope that it will. I do have a wide variety of interests and consider myself a modern day renaissance man. To you, the reader, this means that I hope to write something everyday that at least one person will find useful each day. If I succeed in that, then I will be happy. I am not really an expert on any subjects but have the neccessary enthusiasm and the rudimentary knowledge to write about these. In short, this means that I am a human version of wikipedia.

This blog, as stated above, will allow me to discuss things that affect me the most which are Family, Friends, and the normal thoughts that go through the mind of a forty-some year old adolescent male. If these thoughts can help with anybody going through the same thing, so much the better. If these thoughts somehow pique the interest of Sandra Bullock or Diane Lane, I will be here awaiting their response. As Shakespeare tells us, there is nothing worse than unrequited love.
This journal will also be connected to other specialized blogs that correlate with my interests, they are: Music, Movies, Sports, History, Literature, Politics, Food, Exercise and Technology. I will write reviews about books, music, movies, and the performing arts. I will write essays about books, plays, and movies. I will write about history, for example, on how real history can differ from what we see in the movies or even what we learn in school. I will review food that I eat in restaurants as well as share recipes or share cooking techniques (as I slowly learn the culinary arts). I will write about all that I have learned about exercise and nutrition since my heart attack one year ago (I lived). I will write about sports--mostly as it affects my favorite teams, but occasionally I will jump atop a soapbox to rant on the moral issues (steroids, revenue sharing, role models) that for, better or worse, are entwined with sports. I will talk about politics or at least as much as I can. I am not particularly well-informed, but I do have definite views on the environment, poverty, and the way the United States is viewed by the rest of the world. It won't be hard to determine by my writings that I lean towards the left, I feel this is an advantage because unlike those on the right--I am open to discussion!
Anyway, that is all for now. I hope you enjoy. If you don't, I have been told this is good therapy and will give me something to do in my declining years. If Sandra and Diane are listening though, I am still ascending!